It's been several weeks since the BP-leased oil rig exploded and sank in the Gulf of Mexico leaving a gushing oil well spewing countless gallons 5,000 feet below the surface. Much has been written in the weeks following the explosion as elected officials, scientists, and emergency crews converge on the scene, and everyone seems ready to offer their thoughts.
Well, here are a few of mine.
After my initial wave of guilt for consuming carbon during a drive to school last week (I was listening to a radio program on the now national disaster at the time!) I got to wondering if this wasn't a new generation's Exxon Valdez. Being in my mid-aughts at the time of that disaster, I remember little from the coverage and response at the time. When I asked my peers, they also say they were too young. I can only imagine then that today's college age students were infants, if they were alive at all. It was the 80's after all.
Happening at the worst time in the school year, with students in exams and preparing for graduation -- on college campuses at least -- it's just another news story. There's a run on sea food, turmoil in Greece, elections in the UK, unrest in the financial markets... oh well, at least the plan to capture the spewing oil made it on the Daily show last week. Maybe someone does care.
I'm not sure what I expected the response to be exactly, but at least at the beginning, it hasn't been particularly emotional. Photographic evidence of the devastation has been limited, both by weather and the fact that the oil isn't yet heavily impacting the shoreline and marine life. Without that emotional draw, its less quantifiable, less real, less dramatic.
It's possible that as the story persists in the news media, the emotional response will grow as was the case with the Exxon Valdez disaster. For instance, the recent release of video from the sea floor of the gushing pipes are an eerie reminder of the toxic cloud gathering below the surface of the gulf. It may take much longer for the especially emotional footage of impact to birds and shorelines to appear though.
The recent introduction of a climate bill in the US Senate will allow the political fall out to develop as well. The Exxon Valdez disaster led to several legislation measures, including requirements that oil companies have disaster plans in place, and requirements for double-hulled ships. Only time will tell if this disaster will be capable of coalescing the necessary political power to push forward on another round of legislative and bureaucratic initiatives.
Over the coming months I plan to report back on the effects the disaster is having on the dialogue and behavior in the Duke community. I welcome comments on your experiences with the Exxon Valdez disaster, and any parallels or comparisons that may be drawn with the Deep Water Horizon disaster. Stay tuned.
Monday, May 17, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hey Liz! I've noticed the lack of images of impacted animals as well, but with a quick search found a slideshow: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/03/gulf-oil-spill-photos-ani_n_560813.html
ReplyDeleteAnd another article with a possible explanation for the low number of animals showing immediate signs of impact: http://news.discovery.com/animals/gulf-oil-spill-animal-victim-tally-may-be-misleading.html
Nice article Liz, good to see you care! And I think we are all at a bit of a loss on this one since the solution is so slow coming we feel helpless, but I like the part that enables us to do better in the future! :)
ReplyDelete